關(guān)節(jié)置換相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)文獻(xiàn)1 全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后的髕骨低位是真正的髕骨低位嗎? 譯者:張軼超 將假體植入膝關(guān)節(jié)后,髕骨和脛骨墊片之間的距離變小有兩種可能,即髕骨下移和關(guān)節(jié)線抬高。前者被稱為髕骨低位。而后者的髕骨相對于股骨的位置是正常的,所以被稱為假性髕骨低位。由于髕骨低位是因髕腱短縮造成的,而假性髕骨低位是由于關(guān)節(jié)線的抬高所導(dǎo)致,所以對于這兩種情況的治療方法是不同的。相比假性髕骨低位,在真性低位的翻修術(shù)中,外翻髕骨及伸膝裝置比較困難。重要的是不要想只通過計(jì)算關(guān)節(jié)的Blackburne-Peel 或 the Caton-Deschamps比率來確定是否存在髕骨低位,由于受到關(guān)節(jié)線位置變化的影響這些數(shù)據(jù)經(jīng)常會(huì)誤導(dǎo)我們。 Patella Baja After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is It Really Patella Baja? In the prosthetic knee, narrowing of the space between the patella and the tibial polyethylene can be due to distal positioning of the patella or to a proximal transfer of the joint line. In the former case, one is dealing with patella baja. In the latter case, the patella is in its normal position relative to the femur, a situation we call pseudo–patella baja. The therapeutic options for patella baja and pseudo–patella baja are different because the former is due to a short patellar tendon, and the latter is due to a raised joint line. Eversion of the extensor mechanism during revision surgery may be more challenging with true patella baja compared with pseudopatella baja. It is important not to attempt to detect true patella baja with either the Blackburne-Peel or the Caton-Deschamps ratio in the setting of a prosthetic knee because these ratios are affected adversely by the position of the joint line. 文獻(xiàn)出處:Grelsamer RP.Patella baja after total knee arthroplasty: is itreally patella baja?J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jan;17(1):66-9. 文獻(xiàn)2 全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后站立位片上測量的髖臼和股骨假體前傾角在傳統(tǒng)定義的假體安全區(qū)范圍外 譯者:馬云青 背景:多數(shù)髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后脫位發(fā)生在站立位或坐位時(shí),但對于假體角度安全區(qū)的定義是在仰臥位。我們的目標(biāo)是定位患者術(shù)前和術(shù)后骨盆和髖關(guān)節(jié)的方向,明確在仰臥位定義的假體安全區(qū)角度是否可用于評估術(shù)后站位X線片。 方法:對66例全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)患者的術(shù)前、術(shù)后3D-EOS圖像進(jìn)行評估。所有患者在隨訪期內(nèi)無假體脫位(隨訪時(shí)間12-36個(gè)月)。測量髖臼假體前傾角(含前骨盆平面[APP]和患者功能平面)和股骨假體傾角。同時(shí)測量骶骨斜度、骨盆前傾角、骨盆傾斜角及骨盆投射角。結(jié)果:術(shù)后在APP和患者功能平面,髖臼前傾角均增加(P<.001)。股骨頸前傾角在術(shù)后減少(P=.0942)。術(shù)前骶骨斜度為42.4°(-25.9°至 24°),術(shù)后為40.3°(-4.1°至 64.2°) (P=.013)。骨盆前傾角從術(shù)前15.2°(10.4°至 43.8°)變?yōu)樾g(shù)后17.2°(-6°至 46.7°) (P=0.008)。骨盆傾斜度從術(shù)前的1.12°(-25.9°至 24°)變?yōu)樾g(shù)后的-1.2°(-40.7°至 23.4°)(P=,005)。 結(jié)論:站立位時(shí)多數(shù)患者的髖臼和股骨假體角度在安全范圍以外。 在大多數(shù)患者中,由于骨盆前后傾斜導(dǎo)致前骨盆平面(APP)在站立位不是垂直的。對于站立位骨盆嚴(yán)重前傾或后傾的患者,應(yīng)用以仰臥位定義的假體安全角度范圍是不適當(dāng)?shù)摹?/span> Acetabular andFemoral Anteversions in Standing Position are Outside the Proposed Safe ZoneAfter Total Hip Arthroplasty Background: Although most hip dislocations occur in either standing or sitting position, the safe zone for implant position is defined for the supine position. Our goal was to determine preoperative and postoperative pelvis and hip orientations and whether the safe zone defined in supine position can be used to assess standing radiographs. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional EOS images were assessed in 66 total hip arthroplasty patients. None of the patients had dislocation within the follow-up period (12-36 months). The acetabular anteversion (both anterior pelvic plane [APP] and patient functional plane) and the femoral anteversion were measured. The sacral slope, pelvic version, pelvic inclination, and pelvic incidence were also measured. Results: Acetabular anteversion increased postoperatively in both APP and patient functional plane (P <.001). Femoral neck anteversion decreased postoperatively (P=.0942). Sacral slope was 42.4° (-25.9° to 24°)preoperatively compared with 40.3° (-4.1° to 64.2°) postoperatively (P=.013). Pelvic version changed from 15.2° (-10.4° to 43.8°) to 17.2° (-6° to 46.7°;P=0.008). Pelvic inclination was 1.12° (-25.9° to 24°) before total hip atptnroplasty and -1.2° (-40.7° to 23.4°) postoperatively (P=.005). Conclusion: The acetabular and femoral implant orientations in standing position reside out of the safe zone in most patients. The APP is not vertical in standing position in most patients due to anterior or posterior pelvic tilt. The proposed safe zone in supine position may not be a useful measure in the assessment of standing radiographs of patients with significant anterior or posterior pelvic tilt. 文獻(xiàn)出處:Lazennec JY, Thauront F, Robbins CB, Pour AE. Acetabular and Femoral Anteversionsin Standing Position are Outside the Proposed Safe Zone After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3550-3556.文獻(xiàn)3 截骨縮平臺技術(shù)與拉花松解技術(shù)在內(nèi)翻膝全膝置換術(shù)中的效果對比:前瞻性隨機(jī)對照試驗(yàn) 譯者:張薔 背景:比較內(nèi)翻膝全膝置換術(shù)中應(yīng)用截骨縮平臺技術(shù)與拉花松解技術(shù)對間隙的改變,分別比較屈曲間隙和伸直間隙的改變以及總體成功率。 方法:本研究共納入106例內(nèi)翻膝,要求術(shù)中簡單松解后內(nèi)外側(cè)間隙差距≥3mm。將患者隨機(jī)分配至截骨縮平臺組和拉花松解組,各53例。接下來進(jìn)行截骨縮平臺松解和拉花松解。分別記錄屈曲和伸直間隙變化,以及兩種方法的松解成功率。結(jié)果:伸直間隙變化分別為:截骨縮平臺技術(shù)3.5 ± 0.5 mm V.S. 拉花松解技術(shù) 2.3 ± 0.8 mm。屈曲間隙變化分別為:截骨縮平臺技術(shù)1.1 ± 0.5 mm V.S. 拉花松解技術(shù) 2.3 ± 1.2 mm。總體成功率:截骨縮平臺技術(shù)90.6% V.S. 拉花松解技術(shù)67.9%。 結(jié)論:作為內(nèi)翻膝的松解方法,截骨縮平臺技術(shù)在松解伸直間隙不平衡方面更有效,而拉花松解技術(shù)在松解屈曲間隙不平衡方面更有效。總體成功率截骨縮平臺技術(shù)高于拉花松解技術(shù)。 
用間隙測量器測試內(nèi)外側(cè)間隙差距 
截骨縮平臺(每2mm一次,截骨后再次測試間隙差距直至小于3mm,不夠則繼續(xù)截骨;若已至縮平臺極限仍未達(dá)標(biāo)則標(biāo)記為失敗,繼續(xù)使用拉花進(jìn)行剩余松解) 
拉花松解(使用19號針頭在伸直位施以外翻應(yīng)力下穿刺MCL,每穿10次為一組,每組后再次測試間隙差距,若小于3mm則為成功,若10組后仍未小于3mm則標(biāo)記為失敗,繼續(xù)使用截骨縮平臺進(jìn)行余下的松解)
Reduction Osteotomy VS Pie-Crust Technique as Possible Alternatives for Medial Release in Total Knee Arthroplasty and Compared in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Background: To compare the gap change between the pie-crust technique and reduction osteotomy to determine their effects on flexion and extension gaps and their success rates in achieving ligament balancing during total knee arthroplasty. Methods: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 106 total knee arthroplasties were allocated to each group with 53 cases. If there was a narrow medial gap with an imbalance of ≥3 mm after the initial limited medial release, either reduction osteotomy or pie-crust technique was performed. The changes of extension and flexion medial gaps along with the success rate of mediolateral balancing were compared. Results: There was a significant difference in the change of medial gap in knee extension with mean changes of 3.5 ± 0.5 mm and 2.3 ± 0.8 mm in the reduction osteotomy and pie-crust groups, respectively (P < .001). For flexion gap, greater change was found in the pie-crust group compared with the reduction osteotomy group; the mean medial gap changes in knee flexion were 1.1 ± 0.5 mm and 2.3 ± 1.2 mm in the reduction osteotomy and pie-crust groups, respectively. The success rates were 90.6% and 67.9% in reduction osteotomy and pie-crust groups, respectively (P=.007). Conclusion: As an alternative medial release method, reduction osteotomy was more effective in extension gap balancing, and pie-crust technique was more effective in flexion gap balancing. The overall success rate of mediolateral ligament balancing was higher in the reduction osteotomy group than in the pie-crust group. 文獻(xiàn)出處:Ahn JH, Yang TY, Lee JY. Reduction Osteotomy vs Pie-Crust Technique as Possible Alternatives for Medial Release in Total Knee Arthroplasty and Compared in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2016Jul;31(7):1470-5. 文獻(xiàn)1 什么是Ratliff分型? 譯者:羅殿中 概要:本研究根據(jù)71例兒童股骨頸骨折患者的臨床特點(diǎn),分別就其發(fā)生率、骨折分類、損傷機(jī)制、并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況及治療等方面逐一總結(jié)與闡述。 發(fā)生率:成人股骨頸骨折發(fā)生率為兒童的130倍。兒童股骨頸骨折可以發(fā)生于3-17歲。 
損傷年齡分布
分類:兒童股骨頸骨折可分為4類:經(jīng)骺骨折、經(jīng)頸骨折、股骨頸基底部骨折以及轉(zhuǎn)子處骨折。 損傷機(jī)制:損傷原因多為嚴(yán)重暴力,本研究54例因嚴(yán)重暴力所致,包括高處墜落傷24例、車撞傷16例以及跌落傷14例。 診斷:未移位骨折或可漏診,本研究21例未移位骨折中有2例在入院時(shí)漏診。 并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況:兒童股骨頸骨折并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率高(股骨頭壞死發(fā)生率約42%)。 股骨頭骨骺壞死:依據(jù)影像學(xué)密度改變可分為以下III型(見下圖)。I型:高密度改變彌漫伴股骨頭骨骺完全塌陷;II型:高密度改變局部伴股骨頭骨骺輕微塌陷;III型:高密度改變局限于股骨頸處,未累及骨骺。本研究I型15例,II型、III型各7例。 
作者認(rèn)為,兒童股骨頭骨骺與股骨干骺端血運(yùn)沒有交通支。股骨頭上支持帶動(dòng)脈為股骨頭外上部骨骺的主要供支,圓韌帶動(dòng)脈為次要供支,僅供應(yīng)骨骺內(nèi)下部分。如果上支持帶血運(yùn)自起始部損傷(A處,見下圖),將導(dǎo)致全骺端壞死(I型)。如果干骺端動(dòng)脈分支損傷(B處)將導(dǎo)致干骺端壞死(III型)。如果上支持帶血運(yùn)自頭頸交界處損傷(C處),將導(dǎo)致外上大部股骨頭骨骺壞死(II型)。

本研究共30例(42%)發(fā)生股骨頭骨骺壞死,包括26例移位骨折及4例未移位骨折。23例為經(jīng)頸骨折,6例為股骨頸基底部骨折,另外1例骨折部位不明。需注意的是,成人股骨頸基底部骨折一般不會(huì)導(dǎo)致股骨頭壞死,而本研究顯示,兒童股骨頸基底部骨折可發(fā)生股骨頭骨骺壞死。 
9歲兒童,車撞傷致右股骨頸基底部骨折,5年后發(fā)生股骨頭壞死
延遲愈合或不愈合:本研究中17例患者出現(xiàn)延遲愈合,其中7例發(fā)展為骨折不愈合。 骨骺過早閉合:11例患者出現(xiàn)骨骺早閉。其中6例為股骨頸壞死后骨骺閉合。 
11歲兒童股骨頸骨折,3月后出現(xiàn)III型壞死,壞死位于股骨頸處,未累及股骨頭骨骺

2年后,其右側(cè)股骨頭骨骺閉合
治療: 非移位骨折:15例石膏固定、2例夾板固定、1例臥床休息無石膏或夾板固定、2例框架外固定以及1例切開內(nèi)固定。 移位骨折:該類患者治療效果不滿意,僅不到三分之一的患者獲得好的效果。 具體治療方法包括:閉合復(fù)位后石膏固定19例、閉合復(fù)位后內(nèi)固定19例,復(fù)位后夾板固定3例、骨牽引下逐步復(fù)位1例、切開復(fù)位內(nèi)固定1例、一期轉(zhuǎn)子下截骨4例以及未治療2例。其中近50%的閉合復(fù)位內(nèi)固定患者可獲好的效果。不推薦閉合復(fù)位石膏固定治療移位骨折。 結(jié)論: 1、兒童股骨頸骨折少見,但可發(fā)生于3-16歲各個(gè)年齡段; 2、多由嚴(yán)重暴力因素所致,尤其多見于高處墜落傷或車撞傷; 3、股骨頸骨折后并發(fā)癥多見,如無菌性壞死、延遲愈合、不愈合以及骨骺早閉所致的生長發(fā)育停止; 4、30例患者發(fā)生無菌性壞死(42%),包括3種分型(Ratliff分型); 5、移位型骨折預(yù)后差,49例患者中僅15例效果好。 原文無摘要,上文為對原文的概括總結(jié),文獻(xiàn)出處:A. H. C. RATLIFF. FRACTURES OF THE NECK OF THE FEMUR IN CHILDREN. THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY. 1962;44B(3):528-542. 文獻(xiàn)2 外翻型股骨頭骺滑脫:關(guān)節(jié)運(yùn)動(dòng)的病理生理學(xué)變化和關(guān)節(jié)囊內(nèi)復(fù)位手術(shù)的療效 譯者:程徽 實(shí)驗(yàn)?zāi)康模罕狙芯康哪康氖牵?. 報(bào)告一種由外翻型股骨頭骺滑脫造成的特殊的髖關(guān)節(jié)撞擊;2. 報(bào)告關(guān)節(jié)囊內(nèi)復(fù)位手術(shù)治療該疾病的療效。 實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì):病例系列研究。實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)置:多中心。納入患者:選自6例外翻型股骨頭骺滑脫患者納入研究,共8髖。手術(shù)干預(yù):均進(jìn)行關(guān)節(jié)囊內(nèi)復(fù)位截骨術(shù)。其中,髖臼側(cè)需要治療的患髖同時(shí)進(jìn)行了髖臼周圍截骨術(shù)。主要觀察指標(biāo):臨床轉(zhuǎn)歸和影像學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)歸,以及髖關(guān)節(jié)運(yùn)動(dòng)病理生理學(xué)變化。結(jié)果:6例患者的8側(cè)患髖中,5髖進(jìn)行股骨頭下截骨復(fù)位,3髖進(jìn)行股骨頸截骨復(fù)位。內(nèi)側(cè)突出的干骺端造成了髖臼前壁包容性撞擊,高位的外翻造成了頭頸交界處后方的沖擊性撞擊。術(shù)前平均骺干角是110.5度(90-125度),術(shù)后改善為62度(55-70度)。在最后一次隨訪中,7髖無痛無撞擊,關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)范圍正常。1髖在多次嘗試復(fù)位失敗后進(jìn)行髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)。使用Merle d'Aubigne評分系統(tǒng)評價(jià),5髖功能優(yōu)(18-16分),2髖良(16-15分),1髖差(6分)。結(jié)論:外展型股骨頭骺滑脫畸形造成的撞擊典型而復(fù)雜。解剖復(fù)位可以重建正常的關(guān)節(jié)形態(tài),改善髖關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)范圍,得到滿意的療效。 Valgus Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Pathophysiology of Motion and Results of Intracapsular Realignment
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to report (1) a different but specific pattern of impingement in hips involved with valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis (valgus SCFE) and (2) the results of surgical treatment using intracapsular realignment techniques. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Multiple academic centers. PATIENTS: Six patients with 8 involved hips referred for valgus alignment of proximal femoral epiphysis (valgus SCFE). INTERVENTION: Intracapsular realignment osteotomy combined with periacetabular osteotomy if needed. MAIN OUTCOMEMEASUREMENT: The clinical and radiographical results and pathophysiology of motion. RESULTS: Eight hips in 6 patients were treated with subcapital (5 hips) or femoral neck (3 hips) osteotomy for realignment. The medially prominent metaphysis created an inclusive impingement at the anterior acetabular wall, whereas the high coxa valga favored impacting impingement at the posterior head-neck junction. The mean preoperative epiphyseal-shaft angle of 110.5 (range 90-125 degrees) was reduced to 62 degrees (range 55-70 degrees) postoperatively. At the last follow-up, all but 1 hip were pain-free and impingement-free, with normal range of motion. One hip was replaced after repeated attempts of correction. The overall hip functional result using modified Merle d'Aubigne scoring system was excellent in 5 hips (18-16 points), good in 2 hips (16-15 points), and poor in 1 hip (6 points). CONCLUSIONS: Impingement in valgus SCFE deformity is specific and complex. Anatomical realignment can lead to favorable results by the restoration of normal morphology and impingement-free range of motion. 文獻(xiàn)出處:Kalhor M,Gharanizadeh K, Rego P, Leunig M, Ganz R. Valgus Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Pathophysiology of Motion and Results of Intracapsular Realignment. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Feb;32 Suppl 1:S5-S11. 文獻(xiàn)3
髖臼外側(cè)覆蓋對髖臼盂唇尺寸的預(yù)測 譯者:肖凱 背景:髖關(guān)節(jié)骨性結(jié)構(gòu)的異常通常與軟組織結(jié)構(gòu)異常伴隨存在。如果能充分理解及定義這種伴隨的改變,將會(huì)更好地指導(dǎo)臨床。 目的:研究臨床中接受保髖治療患者的髖臼盂唇尺寸與髖臼外側(cè)覆蓋之間的關(guān)系。方法:本試驗(yàn)為回顧性研究,我們選取了2013年6月至2015年6月間接受保髖治療的236例患者做研究對象。按中心邊緣角(LCEA)大小將患者分為4組,分別是正常覆蓋組(25°-39.9°)、過度覆蓋組(≥40°)、交界性發(fā)育不良組(20°-24.9°)及發(fā)育不良組(<20°)。術(shù)前進(jìn)行髖關(guān)節(jié)核磁共振檢查,對髖臼外側(cè)、前方及前下方盂唇寬度進(jìn)行測量。結(jié)果:髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良組及交界性發(fā)育不良組3個(gè)層面的盂唇寬度均明顯大于正常覆蓋組(P < .001)及過度覆蓋組(P < .001)。有趣的是,髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良組及交界性發(fā)育不良組的盂唇寬度卻比較接近。在髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良組、交界性發(fā)育不良組及正常覆蓋組,髖臼外側(cè)的盂唇最寬,前下方的盂唇最窄(P < .001)。在過度覆蓋組,3個(gè)部位的盂唇寬度無明顯差異。多變量分析顯示,無論測量位置在哪,LCEA都是預(yù)測盂唇寬度最有效的指標(biāo)。結(jié)論:髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良組及交界性發(fā)育不良組負(fù)重區(qū)的盂唇寬度增加,這可能是對于骨性結(jié)構(gòu)缺失的代償。盂唇的寬度可能反應(yīng)關(guān)節(jié)的穩(wěn)定情況,并對交界性髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良的臨床治療方案提供數(shù)據(jù)支持。 Lateral Acetabular Coverage Predicts the Size of the Hip LabrumBACKGROUND: Bony morphological abnormalities of the hip joint are often accompanied by adaptive soft tissue changes. These adaptive changes, if better understood and characterized, may serve to inform clinical decision making. PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between the size of the hip labrum and lateral acetabular coverage in patientsat our hip preservation clinic. METHODS: A cohort of 236 patients seen at a dedicated hip preservation service between June 2013 and June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to the degree of acetabular coverage, as measured by the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA): normal acetabular coverage (25°-39.9°), acetabular overcoverage (≥40°), borderline dysplasia (20°-24.9°), and frank dysplasia (<20°). Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was utilized to measure the length ofthe labrum at 3 locations: laterally, anteriorly, and anteroinferiorly. RESULTS: Frankly dysplastic and borderline dysplastic hips exhibited larger values of labral length at all locations when compared with hips with normal acetabular coverage (P < .001) or acetabular overcoverage (P < .001). Interestingly, mean labral length values in frank dysplasia were statistically similar to corresponding measurements in borderline dysplasia. In hips with frank dysplasia, borderline dysplasia, or normal acetabular coverage, labral length was consistently greatest at the lateral labrum and correspondingly lowest at the anteroinferior labrum (P < .001). In hips with acetabular overcoverage, labral length did not vary significantly between the lateral, anterior, and anteroinferior locations. Multivariate analyses confirmed LCEA to be the strongest predictor of labral length, irrespective of measurement location. CONCLUSION: Patients with borderline dysplasia and frank dysplasia exhibited increased values of labral length in the weight bearing zone, potentially indicating a compensatory reaction to the lack of bony coverage. Labral length may serve as an instability marker and inform clinical decision making for patients with borderline dysplasia. 文獻(xiàn)出處:Garabekyan T, Ashwell Z, Chadayammuri V, Jesse MK, Pascual-Garrido C, Petersen B, Mei-Dan O. Lateral Acetabular Coverage Predicts the Size of the Hip Labrum. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1582-9. 文獻(xiàn)4
青少年髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良患者髖臼周圍截骨術(shù)后恥骨坐骨連接處骨折情況分析 譯者:張振東 背景:髖臼周圍截骨術(shù)(periacetabular osteotom,PAO)可治療成人髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良,其手術(shù)療效已被廣泛認(rèn)可。對于有癥狀的骨骼發(fā)育成熟的青少年患者,亦可行PAO治療。術(shù)后髖關(guān)節(jié)局部應(yīng)力的重新分布或可導(dǎo)致恥骨坐骨連接處骨折(ischio-pubic junction,IPJ)。 方法:本研究回顧性分析本中心1999年至2012年所有接受PAO治療的青少年髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良患者。術(shù)前、術(shù)后6周、術(shù)后1年均拍攝髖關(guān)節(jié)站立正位片,并分別測量外側(cè)CE角、Sharp角、臼頂傾斜角等影像學(xué)指標(biāo),同時(shí)記錄患者術(shù)后改良髖關(guān)節(jié)Harris評分。本研究排除手術(shù)時(shí)年齡大于21歲或隨訪小于2年的患者。結(jié)果:166例患者(187髖)納入該研究,患者年齡為15.6±2.5歲。共有12例患者(12髖)發(fā)生IPJ,占6.4%。其中7髖于術(shù)后即刻攝片時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn),其余5髖于術(shù)后6周隨訪時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)。7例(58.3%)骨折發(fā)生與坐骨截骨處不愈合有關(guān)。所有骨折患者中,6例(50%)在2年復(fù)查時(shí)愈合,另外6例仍未愈合。未發(fā)生IPJ患者與發(fā)生IPJ患者在術(shù)前、術(shù)后6周及末次隨訪時(shí),外側(cè)CE角(P=0.94, 0.29, 0.27)、Sharp角(P=0.95, 0.38, 0.16)、臼頂傾斜角(P=0.37, 0.21, 0.54)均無顯著性差異。術(shù)后改良髖關(guān)節(jié)Harris評分兩組間亦無差異。經(jīng)分析骨折發(fā)生因素,Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT)病更易發(fā)生IPJ (P=0.001)。發(fā)生IPJ患者年齡更大(17.1 vs. 15.5, P=0.05)。兩組患者性別分布無差異(P=0.22)。結(jié)論:青少年髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良患者PAO術(shù)后IPJ發(fā)生率為6.4%,部分患者可發(fā)生在術(shù)中。骨折發(fā)生與Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT)病及坐骨截骨處不愈合有關(guān)。IPJ并不影響PAO手術(shù)療效且發(fā)生后并不需要手術(shù)治療。 Fracture at theIschio-Pubic Junction After Periacetabular Osteotomy in the AdolescentPopulation INTRODUCTION: The Ganz periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-accepted surgical intervention for hip dysplasia. In the adolescent population it is performed in patients who are skeletally mature with symptoms related to acetabular dysplasia. Redistribution of stresses through the hemipelvis after PAO can lead to a fracture at the ischio-pubic junction (IPJ). METHODS: This is an IRB-approved, retrospective analysis of adolescent patients treated with a PAO for acetabular dysplasia from 1999 to 2012 at a single institution. Radiographic measurements were performed to include the lateral center-edge angle, Sharp acetabular index, and acetabular index of the weight-bearing zone. These were measured preoperatively and at 6-weeks and 1 year postoperatively from a standing anterior posterior pelvis radiograph. Postoperative modified Harris hip scores (mHHS) were also analyzed. Patients over the age of 21 at time of surgery and those with <2 years of follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-six patients (187 operated hips) at an average age of 15.6±2.5 were included. Twelve (6.4%) fractures at the IPJ were identified in 12 patients. Seven were identified on the initial postoperative films, whereas 5 were identified after the 6-week visit. Seven (58.3%) fractures had an associated superior posterior ramus nonunion. Six (50%) healed by 2 years after surgery; the remaining 6 (50%) went on to nonunion. Compared with those without a fracture, there was no significant difference in preoperative, 6 weeks postoperative, and final center-edge angle (P=0.94, 0.29, 0.27), Sharp acetabular index (P=0.95, 0.38, 0.16), or AIBWZ (P=0.37, 0.21, 0.54). There was no difference in postoperative mean modified Harris hip scores (P=0.63). Analysis of predisposing factors demonstrated that patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease were more likely to develop an IPJ fracture (P=0.001). Patients with an IPJ fracture were older (17.1 vs. 15.5, P=0.05). There was no difference based on patient sex (P=0.22). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of fracture at the IPJ after PAO in the adolescent population is 6.4% with some occurring at the time of surgery. These fractures are also associated with a nonunion at the superior posterior ramus cut and an underlying diagnosis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth. These fractures are not clinically significant and in this series did not merit further intervention when identified. 文獻(xiàn)出處:Swann M, Sucato DJ, Romero J, Podeszwa DA.Fracture at the Ischio-Pubic Junction After Periacetabular Osteotomy in the Adolescent Population. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017Mar;37(2):127-132. 文獻(xiàn)5 發(fā)育性髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良篩查 譯者:楊金鑫 髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良的篩查一直是個(gè)有爭議的話題。篩查的方法可以是物理檢查(Ortolani法或Barlow法),外加髖部超聲影像檢查(選擇性檢查存在高危因素的患兒還是檢查所有新生兒)。在英國,NIPE指南推薦對所有新生兒行髖部物理檢查,全科醫(yī)生對6-8周齡的新生兒行髖部體檢,對4-6周齡存在易患因素的新生兒行髖部超聲檢查,用以確定DDH。強(qiáng)調(diào)了英國現(xiàn)行篩查政策(物理檢查和超聲檢查)的有效性和困難性。本研究的目的是根據(jù)10年或以上的縱向隊(duì)列研究,對DDH的易患因素和診斷方法的有效性進(jìn)行評估。 結(jié)論:DDH篩查不符合世界衛(wèi)生組織大多數(shù)有效篩查的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并且由于其靈敏度和陽性預(yù)測值(PPV)低,僅被認(rèn)為有監(jiān)測作用。DDH篩查存在過度診斷和過度治療的重大風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。國際上對DDH篩查仍存在分歧。DDH患者主要為女性,故女性被認(rèn)為是易患因素。全科醫(yī)生的篩查中極少有男性DDH患者。全科醫(yī)生對6-8周齡新生兒行髖關(guān)節(jié)體檢陽性檢出率非常低,并且此種方法的篩查診斷存在不確定性。單側(cè)髖關(guān)節(jié)外展受限與新生兒生長發(fā)育的時(shí)間存在相關(guān)性,它在DDH的診斷中是一種有用的臨床體征。大多數(shù)以前被認(rèn)為是“易患因素”的因素并不是真正的易患因素,這些因素與DDH幾乎沒有聯(lián)系。 Screening inDevelopmental Dysplasia of the Hip Screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) is a controversial subject. Screening may be by universal neonatal clinical examination (Ortolani or Barlow manoeuvres) with the addition of sonographic imaging of the hip (selective 'at risk' hips or universal screening in the neonate). In the UK, the NIPE guidelines recommend universal neonatal clinical assessment of the hip joints, a General Practitioner 6-8 week clinical 'hip check' and assessment clinically with sonographic imaging at 4-6 weeks for certain 'at risk' hips for pathological DDH. The effectiveness and difficulties arising from the UK current screening policy (clinical and sonographic) are highlighted. The purpose of the review was to assess the risk factors and efficacy of diagnostic methods in DDH, based on longitudinal cohort studies of 10 years or more. CONCLUSION: Hip screening in DDH does not meet most of the World Health Organisation's criteria for an effective screening programme and should only be considered as surveillance due to its low sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). There is a significant risk of over diagnosis and over treatment. There is no International consensus on screening in DDH. Pathological DDH is mainly a female condition and 'at risk'/General Practitioner screening identifies few pathological cases in male subjects. The General Practitioner 6-8 week 'hip check' has a very low PPV for pathological DDH and is of doubtful value in screening and diagnosis. Unilateral limitation of hip abduction is a time dependent and useful clinical sign in the diagnosis of pathological DDH. The majority of the previously considered 'at risk' factors are not true risk factors with little or no association with pathological DDH. 文獻(xiàn)出處:PatonRW. Screening in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH). Surgeon. 2017.15(5): 290-296. 圖文來源:304關(guān)節(jié)學(xué)術(shù)
|